How we all turned Google into our monopolist
One thought, one click, one answer. In seconds. When we “search” today, we mean “Google.” The word has become a verb, a synonym for knowledge, a global reflex action. But this ultimate triumph of technology is no accident. It is the result of a tacit pact we have all made. Google didn’t simply become a monopolist—we made it so.
We complain about the omnipotence of a corporation that knows more about us than our closest confidants. We fear the lack of alternatives and the transparent citizen. But the uncomfortable truth is: Google didn’t conquer us. We surrendered willingly.
We created this digital god by readily sacrificing what it needed to grow: our convenience, our data, and our lack of competition.

The original sin: We chose the better product
To understand how we got here, we have to go back to the late 1990s. The internet was a chaotic, unstructured place. Search engines like AltaVista, Lycos, and Yahoo delivered unsatisfactory, often irrelevant results, cluttered with flashing banners.
Then came Google!
With a minimalist white page and an algorithm (PageRank) that seemingly magically delivered what we were really looking for. It was fast, it was clean, it was thousands of times better than anything else.
Our first step toward creating the monopoly wasn’t a mistake, but a logical decision. We chose the superior product. We flocked to Google because it worked. And we never looked back.
The convenience trap: “Free” as bait
Our fall from grace was the greed for something better. But our continued existence was bought with “freebies.” Google wasn’t just better, it was free. And it didn’t stop at search.
Google understood faster than anyone else that the future lay not in selling software, but in building an indispensable ecosystem. And we happily stumbled into it:
- Gmail (2004): Why pay for emails or struggle with tiny mailboxes? Google offered one gigabyte (!) of free storage. A shocking offer. We handed them over all our private and business communications.
- Google Maps (2005): Street maps became obsolete. We received a free, all-knowing world map and a navigation system in our pocket. In return, we gave Google our exact location, every step we took, every destination.
- YouTube (2006): Bought and transformed into the world’s largest video platform. We gave Google our free time, our interests, our opinions.
- Google Chrome (2008): A faster, cleaner browser. We gave Google control of the window through which we see the entire internet.
- Android (2007): The “open” operating system. We made Google’s services pre-installed on billions of mobile phones and made it the standard.
At every step, we said “yes.” Yes to more convenience, yes to “free.” Every “yes” was another wall in the gilded cage we built for ourselves.
The fuel: We are the product, not the customer
The true price of “free” was long kept from us, and we didn’t really ask. The price is our data.
We’ve turned Google into a monopolist by tirelessly feeding its machine. We aren’t Google’s customers; advertisers are. We are the product Google sells to them. Every search query, every email, every location, every video watched is a data point. This unimaginably detailed profile of each user is the real treasure. Google knows what we want before we even know it ourselves.
This knowledge makes Google’s advertising system (Google Ads & AdSense) so powerful that no competitor can even come close. By voluntarily surrendering our data, we have stifled every potential competitor in the advertising market.
Behavioral apathy: Why we don’t switch
Even now, knowing the mechanisms, we don’t change our behavior. That’s the strongest evidence that we’re cementing the monopoly.
… There are alternatives:
-
- Search: DuckDuckGo or Ecosia (respect privacy).
- Browser: Firefox or Brave.
- Email: ProtonMail or Tutanota.
Why don’t we use it?
Because it’s inconvenient. Because Gmail works so perfectly with Google Calendar, which in turn is so perfectly integrated with Google Maps. Leaving the ecosystem requires effort. We—the users—actively punish the competition by ignoring it. We complain about data collection while clicking “Agree and Close.” We criticize market power while keeping Google Search as the default on our smartphones.
Conclusion: We created the idol we now fear.
Google’s monopoly isn’t based on steel or oil. It’s based on our collective choices. It’s a monopoly that’s reaffirmed with every single search query we don’t submit to the competition.
Google has brilliant engineers and a ruthless business strategy. But we gave them the real power. We prioritized convenience over diversity. We prioritized “free” over privacy. And we prioritized the efficiency of a single, perfect ecosystem over the chaotic but healthy dynamics of a free market.
We wanted a service that would make our lives easier. We got a corporation that is our lives.
And we set it up that way ourselves!
Beliebte Beiträge
Who owns the future? AI training and the global battle for copyright.
AI companies are training their models with billions of copyrighted works from the internet – often without permission. Is this transformative "fair use" or theft? Authors and artists are complaining because AI is now directly competing with them and copying their styles.
Dynamic ranges in Excel: OFFSET function
The OFFSET function in Excel creates a flexible reference. Instead of fixing =SUM(B5:B7), the function finds the range itself, e.g., for the "last 3 months". Ideal for dynamic charts or dashboards that grow automatically.
Mastering the INDIRECT function in Excel
The INDIRECT function in Excel converts text into a real reference. Instead of manually typing =January!E10, use =INDIRECT(A2 & "!E10"), where A2 contains 'January'. This allows you to easily create dynamic summaries for multiple worksheets.
The best remote maintenance tools for Windows and Mac
Which remote support tool is best for Windows & Mac? From TeamViewer and AnyDesk to Splashtop: We compare the top solutions for IT support and home office. Find the tool with the best performance, security, and the fairest price-performance ratio.
The discount trap: Why supermarket apps don’t give us anything for free
Supermarket apps like Lidl Plus lure customers with discounts. But we don't get anything for free. We pay with our most intimate shopping data. This data turns us into transparent consumers. Retailers use it to analyze and deliberately manipulate our purchasing behavior.
How digital identity turns citizens into objects of surveillance
We are trading privacy for convenience. Our digital identity – from e-IDs to social media likes – is becoming a tool. Corporations and governments are linking data, turning citizens into predictable and transparent objects of surveillance.


























