How we all turned Google into our monopolist
One thought, one click, one answer. In seconds. When we “search” today, we mean “Google.” The word has become a verb, a synonym for knowledge, a global reflex action. But this ultimate triumph of technology is no accident. It is the result of a tacit pact we have all made. Google didn’t simply become a monopolist—we made it so.
We complain about the omnipotence of a corporation that knows more about us than our closest confidants. We fear the lack of alternatives and the transparent citizen. But the uncomfortable truth is: Google didn’t conquer us. We surrendered willingly.
We created this digital god by readily sacrificing what it needed to grow: our convenience, our data, and our lack of competition.

The original sin: We chose the better product
To understand how we got here, we have to go back to the late 1990s. The internet was a chaotic, unstructured place. Search engines like AltaVista, Lycos, and Yahoo delivered unsatisfactory, often irrelevant results, cluttered with flashing banners.
Then came Google!
With a minimalist white page and an algorithm (PageRank) that seemingly magically delivered what we were really looking for. It was fast, it was clean, it was thousands of times better than anything else.
Our first step toward creating the monopoly wasn’t a mistake, but a logical decision. We chose the superior product. We flocked to Google because it worked. And we never looked back.
The convenience trap: “Free” as bait
Our fall from grace was the greed for something better. But our continued existence was bought with “freebies.” Google wasn’t just better, it was free. And it didn’t stop at search.
Google understood faster than anyone else that the future lay not in selling software, but in building an indispensable ecosystem. And we happily stumbled into it:
- Gmail (2004): Why pay for emails or struggle with tiny mailboxes? Google offered one gigabyte (!) of free storage. A shocking offer. We handed them over all our private and business communications.
- Google Maps (2005): Street maps became obsolete. We received a free, all-knowing world map and a navigation system in our pocket. In return, we gave Google our exact location, every step we took, every destination.
- YouTube (2006): Bought and transformed into the world’s largest video platform. We gave Google our free time, our interests, our opinions.
- Google Chrome (2008): A faster, cleaner browser. We gave Google control of the window through which we see the entire internet.
- Android (2007): The “open” operating system. We made Google’s services pre-installed on billions of mobile phones and made it the standard.
At every step, we said “yes.” Yes to more convenience, yes to “free.” Every “yes” was another wall in the gilded cage we built for ourselves.
The fuel: We are the product, not the customer
The true price of “free” was long kept from us, and we didn’t really ask. The price is our data.
We’ve turned Google into a monopolist by tirelessly feeding its machine. We aren’t Google’s customers; advertisers are. We are the product Google sells to them. Every search query, every email, every location, every video watched is a data point. This unimaginably detailed profile of each user is the real treasure. Google knows what we want before we even know it ourselves.
This knowledge makes Google’s advertising system (Google Ads & AdSense) so powerful that no competitor can even come close. By voluntarily surrendering our data, we have stifled every potential competitor in the advertising market.
Behavioral apathy: Why we don’t switch
Even now, knowing the mechanisms, we don’t change our behavior. That’s the strongest evidence that we’re cementing the monopoly.
… There are alternatives:
-
- Search: DuckDuckGo or Ecosia (respect privacy).
- Browser: Firefox or Brave.
- Email: ProtonMail or Tutanota.
Why don’t we use it?
Because it’s inconvenient. Because Gmail works so perfectly with Google Calendar, which in turn is so perfectly integrated with Google Maps. Leaving the ecosystem requires effort. We—the users—actively punish the competition by ignoring it. We complain about data collection while clicking “Agree and Close.” We criticize market power while keeping Google Search as the default on our smartphones.
Conclusion: We created the idol we now fear.
Google’s monopoly isn’t based on steel or oil. It’s based on our collective choices. It’s a monopoly that’s reaffirmed with every single search query we don’t submit to the competition.
Google has brilliant engineers and a ruthless business strategy. But we gave them the real power. We prioritized convenience over diversity. We prioritized “free” over privacy. And we prioritized the efficiency of a single, perfect ecosystem over the chaotic but healthy dynamics of a free market.
We wanted a service that would make our lives easier. We got a corporation that is our lives.
And we set it up that way ourselves!
Beliebte Beiträge
TCL TVs: Price-performance marvel or cheap compromise?
TCL is enticing customers with rock-bottom prices for huge TVs. But are these 65-inch Mini-LED sets really any good? We analyze their strengths and weaknesses, reveal the secret behind the low prices (CSOT), and compare them to Samsung and Sony to see who should consider buying one.
Gehaltsverhandlung führen: 5 Sätze, die du niemals sagen darfst
Ein falscher Satz kann dich Tausende Euro kosten. In der Gehaltsverhandlung lauern rhetorische Fallstricke. Wir zeigen dir, warum Sätze wie "Meine Miete ist gestiegen" tabu sind und wie du stattdessen professionell mit deinem Marktwert argumentierst.
Meta in court: Will the subscription requirement now be overturned?
Those who want an ad-free Facebook experience have to pay – or agree to extensive tracking. A lawsuit challenging this model is now underway. Will the mandatory subscription model be overturned in court? Find out why consumer advocates consider the practice illegal and what this means for users.
Nvidia before the showdown: Insiders sell – Is the AI bubble about to burst?
Nvidia faces crucial earnings reports: Insiders like Peter Thiel are selling off shares in droves. Is the AI hype over, or does the dip offer opportunities? Current analysis.
The Great Feast: Who will survive the streaming war?
The streaming market is imploding. Services like Paramount+ are fighting for survival, and Disney is posting billions in losses. Is a major wave of mergers imminent? What will happen to our content and subscriptions when the consolidation begins?
10 signs that it’s time for a new job!
Dissatisfied with your job? This article reveals 10 clear signs that a job change might be necessary. If the Sunday blues become chronic, you're no longer learning anything, or you lack appreciation, it's time to be honest with yourself. A guide to making your career decision.

























